Putin is still destroying ISIS and is resisting the New World Order. He is still against NATO’s expansionist ideology. For that reason, Madeleine Albright thinks that he is evil.
…by Jonas E. Alexis
Madeleine Albright has morally and politically stripped herself naked. She has recently declared that Vladimir Putin “is smart, but a truly evil man.” Albright proves that she is not all that bright by adding: “a KGB officer, who wants to keep everything under control and believes that everyone conspires against Russia.”
Let us see if Albright’s promiscuous reasoning stands to rational scrutiny. In 1996, the Jewish lady and former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations was being interviewed on 60 Minutes. She was asked to comment on the U.S. sanctions in Iraq, which literally ended up squeezing at least 500,000 children to death. The interviewer asked: “We have heard that half a million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?”
Without batting an eye, Albright responded: “we think the price is worth it.” In other words, Albright was willing to damn everything, including sending children into a hellish existence in Iraq, in order to accomplish her diabolical plan. Practical reason in the political realm here is of no use because it does not support Albright’s perversion.
There is more: “Albright wrote later that Saddam Hussein, not the sanctions, was to blame.” When Albright realized that her own satanic weltanschauung wouldn’t be supported by any rational person, she later declared: “I had fallen into a trap and said something I did not mean.” Fallen into a trap? A reasonable question which demands a reasonable answer is a trap?
You see, since practical reason is against irrational ideas, and since Albright was obviously siding with immoral behavior, she had to say that she fell into a trap.
Putin is destroying ISIS and is still resisting the New World Order in Syria. He is still against NATO’s expansionist ideology. For that reason, Albright thinks that he is evil. In fact, Albright says,
“I am very proud of the NATO expansion. Then we managed to use the power of Western Europe and help the Balkan states. The United States saw its role as an indispensable nation which should do good all over the world.”
So, killing at least 500,000 children is a good thing; promoting Zionist expansionism all over the world, including in distant places like China, is great. But attacking ISIS in Syria is really evil. What kind of world is this woman living in? Shouldn’t she start getting her head examined?