, ,

If NWO agents and Satanists think that Putin is going to stand by and let them annihilate Russia, then they’ve got another thing coming. Perhaps Putin will tell them: “To forgive terrorists is up to God, and my job is to arrange the meeting.”

"Do your worst, NWO agents and Satanists. Let me remind you that Russia will survive."

“Do your worst, NWO agents and Satanists. Let me remind you that Russia will survive.”

…by Jonas E. Alexis


As Jim W. Dean usually says, some ideas are so stupid and crazy that a person with an ounce of common sense simply can’t make them up. They have to be the inventions of psychopaths or people who are completely out of touch with the real world.

Things have certainly been a little crazier than usual in the political landscape over the past few days. The so-called think tank known as the Atlantic Council has proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that New World Order agents and political Satanists have and will continue to use terrorism and black operations to pursue their diabolical plan.

The organization has recently cranked out a paper which explicitly demanded that Poland “reserve the right to attack Russian infrastructure including Moscow’s public transportation system and the offices of RT and Sputnik via electronic warfare.”[1]

When I first read this at Sputnik News, I quickly gave it the benefit of a doubt because it was too outrageous. But as I read the actual paper, it turns out that Sputnik News was right. The Council Atlantic paper is entitled “Arming for Deterrence: How Poland and NATO Should Counter a Resurgent Russia,” written by Gen. Sir Richard Shirreff and Maciej Olex-Szczytowski. It states:

“Poland should announce that it reserves the right to deploy offensive cyber operations (and not necessarily in response just to cyberattacks). The authorities could also suggest potential targets, which could include the Moscow metro, the St. Petersburg power network, and Russian state-funded media outlets such as RT.”

What usually happens when an underground railway system abruptly stops? Well, sometimes civilians die or get hurt. And when words such as “offensive cyber operations” are used, then you know that covert or terrorist activities are taking place. We are told that the Moscow metro usually carries 10 million people on a daily basis. So, if “offensive cyber operations” ever take place, you know that civilians will die.

According to the Geneva Conventions Article 51(2), such “offensive cyber operations” are crimes and are in complete violation of international law:

“The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence, the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population are prohibited.”

In other words, the Atlantic Council is intentionally plotting false flags in Russia. Keep in mind that the Atlantic Council is not some kind of conspiracy organization out there. As previously suggested, this is a widely known think tank in Washington.

But this is not the first that time Maciej Olex-Szczytowski, one of the authors of the paper, marshaled an attack on Russia. Back in 2007, he and a number of other talking heads wrote in the Financial Times that “Russian gas pipeline would be geopolitical disaster for EU.”[2]

Richard Shirreff, the other author of the Atlantic Council paper, wrote an article in the Daily Mail last May entitled, “Why we could be at war with Russia next year: The apocalyptic vision of the British general and Nato chief threatened with the sack for blasting Tory defence cuts.”[3]

"We have no clue why NATO put us in the Baltic region."

“Russia would cook us like chickens. We have no clue why NATO put us in the Baltic region.”

The fundamental questions are simply these: why would a “respected” organization like the Atlantic Council be involved in terrorist activities and psychological warfare? Why would they use civilians as a distraction?

Well, one reason is that the New World Order agents and Satanists are desperate. They also have abandoned reason and embraced something else. In fact, they have inexorably gone mad. We are told in the same paper:

“There can be no credible defense, and therefore deterrence, without an effective joint defense plan that unifies military capabilities from across the maritime, land, air, cyber, and space domains. NATO is clearly best placed to conduct and, if necessary, implement such a plan at the operational level under strategic direction from NATO’s military headquarters, Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE).”

The paper also states:

Russia has thus become the most serious geopolitical and military threat to NATO. Paradoxically, Moscow accuses the Alliance of encircling Russia and preparing for a military aggression against it, even though NATO’s military footprint in the areas covered by the NATO/Russia Founding Act has been extremely modest, particularly in comparison with the military assets Russia has directed toward Europe.”

Did you catch the implicit contradiction? We are told that Russia is “the most serious geopolitical and military threat to NATO.” Yet in the very same breath it is stated that “NATO’s military footprint” around the Baltic area “has been extremely modest.” Who are those people really fooling here?

As we have repeatedly argued elsewhere, when you have excluded reason from your political worldview, then soon or later you are going to look silly.

continue reading