We understand that Israel has its own national interests. But please stop with the baloney
Haaretz just published the magnum opus of Israeli mourning for what “could have been” in Syria.
We are of course referring to “They Broke It, They Should Fix It: Let Russia and Iran Pay to Rebuild Syria”. If you enjoy the headline, you’ll love the self-righteous delusions which follow it.
According to Haaretz: Israel yearned for democracy in Syria; Israel wanted desperately to help fight Islamic State in Syria; Israel wanted to provide humanitarian aid to Syrian refugees.
But Haaretz very helpfully clarifies: Syrian democracy was destroyed by Russia and Iran’s support for Assad and an “opposition dominated by Islamist militants”; Defeating Islamic State is a “no-brainer”, but it “would involve partnering with Iran”; and while Israel would love to provide aid to suffering Syrians, “realistically there’s no policy that will yield the kind of results that would truly benefit the Syrian people.”
Israel absolves itself of any wrongdoing or even sideline support for the “moderate” rebels. (Israel was “cheer[ing] on the white hats in Syria’s six-year civil war”; Israel had “hopes” for the Arab Spring, says Haaretz.)
Israel was just trying to be a good neighbor. The real culprits of this conflict are Russia and Iran, the two countries that “broke” Syria:
The bill for reconstruction is estimated at $200 billion, and some say it could even reach five times that figure. Never exactly an economic tiger, Syrian GDP would have to grow at a 5% annual rate for the next 30 years to get back to where it was in 2010. Who’s going to pay the bill?
Naturally, it should be the Russians and Iranians. Assad is their man and Syria their ally.
Needless to say, Moscow and Tehran don’t see it that way. Yes, they broke it, so they should pay for it, but as they see it, the U.S., Europe, Turkey and the Gulf powers helped break Syria, too.
Last month Mikhail Bogdanov, Russia’s deputy foreign minister for Middle East issues, told European Union diplomats that Moscow would contribute nothing to a reconstruction effort he estimated would cost tens of billions of dollars.
That is chutzpah of the first order, but to be fair, the Russians don’t have the kind of money, and neither do the Iranians. If the money is going to be delivered, it will be from the West.
We’ve been keeping a close eye on the Israeli media over the last few days, and we’re amazed at its transparent eulogies for ISIS and the “moderate” rebels:
An interesting choice of words. Especially the “carved up” part. We suppose that if any country knows anything about carving up Syria, it would be Israel.
We are of course referring to Syria’s Golan Heights, the “western two-thirds” of which are currently occupied and administered by Israel. Did we type “occupied”? We mean liberated.
For the last six years, Israel has tried to pretend that it has no horse in the “western/Sunni medieval dictatorship” war against Syria. Like Swiss bankers hoarding Nazi gold during World War II, Israel claimed total neutrality as it waited impatiently to cash in.